TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tuiVr-00005dC; Thu, 7 Mar 96 10:25 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 7 Mar 1996 10:51:15 +600 CDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
Priority:
normal
TO:
X-Confirm-Reading-To:
"John Gully" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3007
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ASl513.0.jw5.MumFn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"John Gully" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Mon Mar 11 17:
36:39 1996
X-Mailer:
Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)
Organization:
CompuRoute, Inc.
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Address,

No PUN intended.

Does anyone have experience in using external solution vibrators 
in Wet area Processes?  Ultrasonics is out of the question, due to
cost.  Direct attachment of vibrators to the plating tanks is out 
of the question, since we are using polypropylene tanks.  

For the past several weeks I've been evaluating Teflon and some 
new chemicals by manual vibration (a hammer to the plating racks).
I now know this works, but who and where do I get the vibrators 
from?  And what type of cost are we looking at?  

Can someone advise immediately.  I would like to continue my 
evaluations with automated vibrators.

Regards,

John Gulley - Process Engineering
email: [log in to unmask]
214-340-0543





ATOM RSS1 RSS2