 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 1996 10:58:44 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Mar 11 17: |
35:29 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"75BUZ1.0.kq3.TRmFn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tui21-00005dC; Thu, 7 Mar 96 09:55 CST |
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am interested in finding out if many of the board shops, or OEM's
subscribed to Technet are seeing an requirement for SEC and SIR
significantly tighter than the current Bellcore requirement. ie
SEC.......1 micro gramme per sq. cm. NaCl equivelant
SIR.......3000 megohms after HASL
I have seen requests almost an order of magnitude tighter for both
parameters and am wondering if this in response to an industry trend or just
isolated cases. I am interested in finding out where our industry is
heading, in this regard, and if any of the subscribers could suggest why a
customer may need such tight controls.
Keith Lumley, RexCan Circuits
|
|
|
