Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tsUEb-0000DYC; Fri, 1 Mar 96 06:46 CST |
Encoding: |
64 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 96 12:01:54 CST |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Fri Mar 1 08: |
35:58 1996 |
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"PuQ3b1.0.n68.07lDn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have a follow up question, what is the mininum associated gold
thicknesses for gold on areas to be soldered. In Table 3-2 it only
states .8 um (Max).
Thanks,
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Electroless Ni/Immersion Au
Author: [log in to unmask] at Dell_UNIX
Date: 2/28/96 5:18 AM
IPC-6012, Qualification and Performance Specification for Rigid Printed
Boards, identifies the following minimums:
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
Nickel to act as a
barrier for copper-tin 1.0 um 1.3 um 1.3 um
compounds
Gold for edge-board
connectors and areas not 0.8 um 0.8 um 1.3 um
to be soldered
um = micrometers
It should be noted that this document is in proposal stage. These numbers
are subject to revision during the development of the document. This
document is to replace IPC-RB-276.
****************************************
Lisa M. Williams
Technical Staff
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062
phone: (847) 509-9700 x 379
fax: (847) 509-9798
email: [log in to unmask]
****************************************
On Mon, 26 Feb 1996 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> A question,
>
> Are there any reports or IPC data which details the minimum amounts of
> electroless nickel needed to provide a sufficient barrier to copper migration
> and the minimum amounts immersion gold needed to provide sufficient plating
> finish.
>
> Concerns are solderability failures and corrosion of components.
>
> Annmarie Rainford
> Merix Corporation
> Forest Grove, Oregon 97116
> 503-359-9300 x74426
>
>
|
|
|