TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 29 Feb 96 17:34:31 gmt
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2948
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"tNxN.0.C39.VJVDn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"D.C.Whalley" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Thu Feb 29 12:
57:03 1996
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tsDOX-000071C; Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:48 CST
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Kevin,

Have you considered a different heatsink material e.g. SiC reinforced Al?
You could match its TCE to the ceramic and perhaps revert to a standard
PCB material.

David Whalley

>I am working with a design that requires CTE management for solderjoint 
>fatigue of a leadless ceramic component, and I am considering random fiber 
>aramid pwb construction.  The problem I have is that the solder side copper 
>heat sink modulus is almost 10X that of the pwb and the results of the 
>composite heat sink assembly is of little benefit of CTE the component sees.
>
>Can anyone recommend a heat sink/pwb adhesive that is forgiving enough to 
>allow the expansion differences while still having good properties of 
>shear/peel strength and thermally conductive?
>
>Thank You in Advance,
>Kevin Thorson



ATOM RSS1 RSS2