Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tr4V3-00008aC; Mon, 26 Feb 96 09:06 CST |
Sender: |
|
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 96 13:59:01 -0500 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Posted: |
Mon, 26 Feb 96 14:04:01 -0500 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"XbPYd.0.SP6.SnSCn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
"Jim Marsico" <"marsico%Organization=Industrial & Mfg'g Engineering%Telephone=516-595-5879"@a1.allin1.ALLIN1.umc> |
X-Loop: |
|
Msg-Class: |
ALL-IN-1 IOS Server for VMS V3.0 PBL123A (US) ENGLISH 21-MAR-1992 |
From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 26 14: |
21:09 1996 |
Message-Id: |
<31600162206991/151845@ALLIN1> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Reflowing solder paste on fiducials and in-circuit test pads shouldn't cause
any problems. We've been performing ICT on assemblies with solder on the test
pads for years. I can't speak for all, but I know that the majority of
component placement systems can read solder coated fiducials quite well.
Jim Marsico
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|