TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tr4V3-00008aC; Mon, 26 Feb 96 09:06 CST
Sender:
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 26 Feb 96 13:59:01 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2875
TO:
Return-Path:
Posted:
Mon, 26 Feb 96 14:04:01 -0500
Resent-Message-ID:
<"XbPYd.0.SP6.SnSCn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Jim Marsico" <"marsico%Organization=Industrial & Mfg'g Engineering%Telephone=516-595-5879"@a1.allin1.ALLIN1.umc>
X-Loop:
Msg-Class:
ALL-IN-1 IOS Server for VMS V3.0 PBL123A (US) ENGLISH 21-MAR-1992
From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 26 14:
21:09 1996
Message-Id:
<31600162206991/151845@ALLIN1>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Reflowing solder paste on fiducials and in-circuit test pads shouldn't cause 
any problems.  We've been performing ICT on assemblies with solder on the test 
pads for years.  I can't speak for all, but I know that the majority of 
component placement systems can read solder coated fiducials quite well.

Jim Marsico
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2