 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 1996 21:46:53 -0500 (EST) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"FSFH-1.0.7JE.-7qlo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Dec 24 12: |
55:09 1996 |
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vcMkZ-0000UEC; Mon, 23 Dec 96 20:37 CST |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
How do you 'waste' components during placement?
>
> I am attempting to arrive at a reasonable figure for the amount of
>components that should be provided for SMT assembly, over and above the
>actual component count needed to complete the boards (i.e. to compensate for
>components wasted during placement). 1%, 3%, 5%, or whatever. If you know
>of an industry standard, or have a company policy, I'd like to know what it
>is. My email address is "[log in to unmask]". Thanks.
>
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
