TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vanDV-0000XqC; Thu, 19 Dec 96 12:29 CST
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:10:09 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7BIT
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/8724
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 23 12:
07:04 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"NeIRd.0.nyA.rbOko"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Timothy Gaylor)
X-Status:
X-Loop:
MIME-Version:
1.0 (WebTV 1.0)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (45 lines)
At first we had a few worries of contaminants in the plating baths and
we Carbon and peroxide treated one  bath and no improvement. There were
a few suggestions of having fungus in the brightner lines, as it is
automatically added based on an amphour meter. 
All brightner lines were changes to eliminate this possibility. 
 
For more information about the baths: 
All three acid copper baths are in the same plating line. All baths
using one hoist and is controlled by a central computer. 
 
The nodules seem to have shown up in all three baths apporximately the
same time. 
 
Characteristics all three baths have in common: 
 
Same agitation speed 
Central controller (computer) 
All three baths are Hot loading-with a 5 second lag 
 
We are currently using PC-606 brightner. 
All chloride levels are checked and all well within the vedors specs. 
 
Questions: 
 
1. Can a 5 second lag for hot loading be detrimental to copper plating? 
2. What results will we see on a Copper plated panel if the ripple in
the rectifier is excessive.  

If you have any suggestions or need more info, please let me know.
I'll get back with you on anode to cathode distance

T. Gaylor 

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2