 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tq0QF-00008aC; Fri, 23 Feb 96 10:32 CST |
| Sender: |
|
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 1996 09:35:49 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 26 13: |
20:06 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"0niCl.0.kT8.gmUBn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| X-Mailer: |
GNNmessenger 1.2 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would appreciate anyone's help regarding problems with poor
adhesion of Dupont 9400 series resist. This film is prone to
break down in our copper and tin tanks, and also in Body Plate
Gold (most prevalent.) We have tried a variety of process changes
including increasing the laminating roll temp. to 120 degrees C.
but have not solved this problem.
Thanks all!
Dave Rosato
SAE Circuits Colorado, Inc.
(303) 530-1900
e-mail at [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
