TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vZf6o-0000RMC; Mon, 16 Dec 96 09:37 CST
Encoding:
84 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 16 Dec 96 09:45:22 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/8597
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"LQn0L.0.877.MoMjo"@ipc>
From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 16 10:
01:03 1996
From:
"Allen Hertz" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Subject:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
Dave,
Very valid points! 

Technet,

I would like to add one finding pertaining to solderability of electroless 
nickel - gold: Most have assumed the Phosphorus level is a major contributor to 
the solderability of this surface finish. Experiments completed in my past life 
have demonstrated that the nickel application process removes a portion of the 
copper, placing trace amounts of copper into the bath. Upon saturation, the 
copper is then re-depositied embedded in the nickel. The embedded copper 
oxidizes, making the surface unsolderable. Varying the levels of Phosphorus did 
not effect the solderability or yields during high volume experiments!

Allen Hertz
Racal-Datacom
[log in to unmask]
_______________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: solderability test for ENIG PCB finish
Author:  [log in to unmask]
Date:    12/15/96  12:04 PM

     Good Morning TechNet!
     
     Your method of conducting a solderability test should not change just 
     because you are not using a tin/lead finish! I suggest using one of 
     the tests in ANSIJ-STD-003. With the emergence of the new alternative 
     finishes (e.g. gold, silver, palladium) the specifications are still 
     playing catch-up but the basic test methods are still applicable. You 
     may need to change a dwell time because of dissolution rates (e.g. 
     palladium) or may want to use a different flux because of your process 
     (e.g. OSP type finishes) - work with your pwb vendor to have an 
     acceptable test procedure both groups can use. I only have one 
     reference in my pile of papers that discusses the relationship of 
     solderability and E nickel but it's pretty good. Try:
     
     "Factors Influencing Solderability Of Electroless Ni-P Deposits", Jing 
     Fang, Plating & Surface Finishing, pages 44-47, July 1992. 
     
     Good Luck
     
     Dave Hillman
     Rockwell Collins
     [log in to unmask]
     
     
     


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: solderability test for ENIG PCB finish
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ccmgw1
Date:    12/13/96 10:44 PM


Dear Technetters,
     
 What is a quick, easy & effective way of assessing
solderability/ wettability of a PCB with electroless nickel/immersion gold 
(ENIG) finish? How does phosphorus content in the Ni deposits affect 
solderability? Will a lower %P content in Ni be more prone to 
passivation/oxidation & thus affecting solderability??
     
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           * 
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************
     

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2