 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<simon.ipc.org!uunet.uu.net!zytec!owl!patb> |
| Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 96 16:04:47 CST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 16 08: |
50:02 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"_jd6M3.0.zgF.UzUio"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
simon.ipc.org!uunet.uu.net!zytec!owl!patb (RwF - ext. 355 - Pat Bailey) |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vYhcj-0000SBC; Fri, 13 Dec 96 18:06 CST |
| X-Mailer: |
Pronto E-Mail [version 2.01] |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was wondering what policies others have regarding accepting x-outs on
multiple board arrays. We currently allow 50%, with the intent being we
would use a two up array with one x-out, but don't want to see 10 x-outs on
a 20 up array. We are contemplating going to something different, say 5%
or 1, whichever is greater. Or possibly no x-outs, but I'm concerned about
the cost ramifications of this (cost is a function of yield, right?). I
would appreciate any input from both fabricators and assemblers.
Regards,
Pat Bailey
Zytec Corporation
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
