TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tpaO2-00008aC; Thu, 22 Feb 96 06:44 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 22 Feb 1996 07:48:57 -0500
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 26 12:
33:33 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"nE3Nx.0.30A.vK6Bn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2828
Resent-Sender:
Resent-From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Dear TechNet:

We currently are using a solvent for tape residue removal after HASL that is
a "middle treated hydrodistillate" (100% petroleum hydrocarbons).  It is
sprayed in a conveyorized system.  This material can cause various problems
in our waste water treatment system, so we are looking for an acceptable
alternative.

We have tried no-residue tapes, but quality has been lacking.  

The ideal tape residue material (if a solvent/organic material) will have
no/low VOCs and not interefere with waste treatment processes.  If not low/no
VOC, a very low vapor pressure will help.

I thank you in advance for any suggestions.

Chris Ford
Env. Engineer
Printed Circuit Corporation



ATOM RSS1 RSS2