Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vXGgw-0000SKC; Mon, 9 Dec 96 19:09 CST |
From [log in to unmask] Tue Dec 10 08: |
49:02 1996 |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Dec 96 16:46:17 PST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"tl_TM.0.b9M.jWBho"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Though the HASL process may be considered a severe test for solder
mask adhesion, the lack of adequate adhesion does not always reveal
itself at this process.
It has been my experience, more times than maybe I'd like to admit,
that I have shipped product to my customer believing that the solder
mask adhesion was adequate, later to find out that it did not hold up
to their wave soldering process.
This does not in any way indicate that it is always the board
fabricators process either.
There are many different factors that can influence solder mask
adhesion.
I'm with you Paul, not enough information has been shared to be able
to establish a conclusive answer to this problem.
Terry Pearo
Marcel Electronics
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Soldermask peeling
Author: [log in to unmask] at Internet
Date: 12/9/96 4:09 PM
In your message dated Monday 9, December 1996 you wrote :
> SMOBC
> Funny, no one has thought to mention that it may be the
> Fabricator's application for the defect. Is that not a
> possibility?
>
The HASL process normally used to produce SMOBC is a pretty severe test of
solder mask adhesion unless these have not been HASLed. Maybe they are
Nickel/Gold or some other finish. As others have noted, we still crave more
complete information as guessing in the dark is not much help.
Paul Gould
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|