 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vXFPo-0000RMC; Mon, 9 Dec 96 17:47 CST |
| Lines: |
13 |
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Dec 10 08: |
48:30 1996 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:27:34 GMT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-User: |
Alpha Test Version Of FI-Mail, DisWin 1.5C:\WINSOCK\WINDIS |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"65Rh43.0.XG6.3KAho"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
FIMail V0.9d |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In your message dated Monday 9, December 1996 you wrote :
> SMOBC
> Funny, no one has thought to mention that it may be the
> Fabricator's application for the defect. Is that not a
> possibility?
>
The HASL process normally used to produce SMOBC is a pretty severe test of
solder mask adhesion unless these have not been HASLed. Maybe they are
Nickel/Gold or some other finish. As others have noted, we still crave more
complete information as guessing in the dark is not much help.
Paul Gould
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
