TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X400-Content-Type:
P2-1988 ( 22 )
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
09 Dec 96 10:03:24 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Conversion:
Allowed
Disclose-Recipients:
Prohibited
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 9 11:
49:00 1996
X-Loop:
Content-Return:
Allowed
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/8345
TO:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> (Return requested)
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vX8a4-0000SBC; Mon, 9 Dec 96 10:29 CST
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X400-Originator:
X400-Recipients:
non-disclosure;
Alternate-Recipient:
Allowed
Message-Id:
<04D1832AC2A3C004*/c=us/admd=cwmail/prmd=carrier/o=syracuse/ou=ccmail1/s=Parr/g=Aric/@MHS>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"UIrSO1.0.lx9.Yv3ho"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Aric Parr" <[log in to unmask]>
Priority:
non-urgent
X400-Received:
by /c=us/admd=cwmail/; Relayed; 09 Dec 96 10:03:24 -0500 by mta MTAwltk in /c=us/admd=cwmail/; Relayed; 09 Dec 96 10:03:24 -0500
Content-Identifier:
04D1832AC2A3C004
X400-Mts-Identifier:
[/c=us/admd=cwmail/; 04D1832AC2A3C004-MTAwltk]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)

     All soldermasks lose adhesion after a wave profile. If you have a 20% 
     loss, check all processes for loss of temperature control. It could 
     also be a supplier issue with dirty panels prior to mask application.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Soldermask peeling
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet
Date:    12/9/96 8:36 AM


     We recently experienced soldermask peeling after wave from 
     three different Fabricators all within 2 weeks. Subsequently 
     we took sample lots of each Fabricator and performed a 
     pre-wave and post-wave tape test. In all lots the boards 
     passed pre-wave tape test but had a 10-25% failure post wave. 
     What can cause this phenomena? Does the weather change have 
     anything to do with soldermask application and durability?
     
     Dan Hickey
     Senior Buyer
     Vicor
     [log in to unmask]
     
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           * 
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2