TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vX895-0000bxC; Mon, 9 Dec 96 10:01 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 09 Dec 96 07:21:53
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 9 11:
48:47 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"R4j301.0.P7I.mU3ho"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/8343
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)

     
Dan,

   I'm going to ask what might be an obvious question, is it SMOBC (Soldermask 
Over Bare Copper)? or did the surface layer get finished with tin/lead before 
soldermasking the fab? The only time I've ever experienced mask coming off in 
the wave was because of that. The plating is becoming liquidous and the mask 
loses it's adhesion. That's kinda' the direction I'm leaning because you say 
that the fab passes the tape test prior to wave.

   Let us all know if you figure it out, I'm a bit curious why that might happen
if it isn't a plating beneath the mask.



              __\/__
          .  / ^  _ \  .                                                        
          |\| (o)(o) |/|
#------.OOOo----oo----oOOO.-----#
#        Steve Gregory          #                                               
#  [log in to unmask]    #
#                               #                       
#________________Oooo.__________#                       
          .oooO  (   )
          (   )   ) /                                   
           \ (   (_/                               
            \_)              
     
      
     
     
     
     >We recently experienced soldermask peeling after wave from three different 
     >Fabricators all within 2 weeks. Subsequently we took sample lots of each 
     >Fabricator and performed a pre-wave and post-wave tape test. In all lots 
     >the boards passed pre-wave tape test but had a 10-25% failure post wave. 
     >What can cause this phenomena? Does the weather change have anything to do 
     >with soldermask application and durability?
     
     >Dan Hickey
     >Senior Buyer
     >Vicor 
     >[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2