X400-Content-Type: |
P2-1984 (2) |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Nov 1996 10:45:46 +0000 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Dec 3 14: |
05:02 1996 |
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
Priority: |
Urgent |
X400-MTS-Identifier: |
[/PRMD=icl/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/;kid0139 0000031700000024] |
TO: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
X400-Originator: |
|
X-Mailing-List: |
|
X400-Recipients: |
non-disclosure:; |
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vT4HC-0000QBC; Thu, 28 Nov 96 05:05 CST |
Message-ID: |
<"24*/I=F/S=Frimpong/OU=kid0139/O=icl/PRMD=icl/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/"@MHS> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"gMM0H2.0.R2H.X7Ndo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X400-Received: |
by mta bath.mail.pipex.net in /PRMD=pipex/ADMD=pipex/C=gb/; Relayed; Thu, 28 Nov 1996 11:13:09 +0000
by mta feldr1 in /PRMD=pipex/ADMD=pipex/C=gb/; Relayed; Thu, 28 Nov 1996 10:44:52 +0000
by mta kid01c1 in /PRMD=pipex/ADMD=pipex/C=gb/; Relayed; Thu, 28 Nov 1996 10:46:16 +0000
by /PRMD=icl/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/; Relayed; Thu, 28 Nov 1996 10:45:46 +0000 |
Alternate-Recipient: |
Allowed |
Content-Identifier: |
24 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello TechNetters, does any body know of any alternatives to
flip chip bumping? It seems to me this backend processing is
rather costly particularly for low volume applicatons.
Has anyone done any work in this department?
Frank Frimpong(Graduate research Engineer)
Salford University
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|