TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vSlfd-0000VhC; Wed, 27 Nov 96 09:13 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 27 Nov 1996 10:21:54 -0500
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/8055
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Tue Dec 3 13:
57:45 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"B3a-L1.0.x-A.sf5do"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)

<<  1. What is "Copper mirror corrosion test"  ?

The copper mirror corrosion test is outlined in ANSI-J-STD-004.  The test
sample is a glass slide with a thin film of copper vacuum deposited on the
surface.  Three drops of the flux are placed on the slide for a set amount of
time.  A benign flux will not eat through the copper, a moderate flux will
partially eat through, and an active flux will eat totally through.  

>> 2. Whether this test needs to be done for "water soluble flux" used for
wave soldering ?

It is generally accepted that water soluble fluxes, as active fluxes, will
eat through the copper, thus failing this test.  If you are using a flux
which has been qualified to J-STD-004 or MIL-F-14256, the vendor should
already have these test results available.

>> 3. What are the other tests which need to be done before using the water
soluble flux for wave soldering ?

It depends on what your goals are and what your customer wants.  If you are
manufacturing to old contracts for military, you may need to do MIL-STD-2000A
testing before you can make such a change.  For commercial customers, testing
to ANSI J-STD-001 would be a minimum recommendation.  It all depends on what
your customer or your management considers to be an adequate demonstration
that the new process is acceptable.  For right now, I would suggest that you
use J-STD-001, the A revision, since the B revision qualification scheme has
a few bugs that need to be worked out.

Doug Pauls
CSL

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2