 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vSO5z-0000SOC; Tue, 26 Nov 96 08:02 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 26 Nov 1996 09:02:16 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Dec 3 11: |
36:49 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"CycAR.0.WpI.2Ylco"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Sun-Charset: |
US-ASCII |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Need to understand....
My Sep 91 copy of 275 states on pg 64 in Table 5-11 that the
internal minimum annular ring (MAR) for Class 1, 2 and 3 (have
absolutely no idea what Class 3 Military means) shall be .001. My
fabricator points out that the Mar 92 copy of 276 states on pg 9
para 3.7.2 that the internal MAR for Class 3 shall be .001, fine,
but that the MAR for Class 2 allow 25% or 90 degree breakout. Which
boat did I miss this time????? Also, if someone could explain the
REJECT of Concept A, in Fig 1 Coupon F on pg 9 of 276, I would be
very grateful. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bob Vanech
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
