TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0todjk-00006yC; Mon, 19 Feb 96 16:07 CST
Encoding:
18 TEXT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 19 Feb 96 16:19:00 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2762
TO:
IPC Technet <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"EJsFW3.0.HuB.FIFAn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Kaylor Karl <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Sender:
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Mail V3.0
From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 20 16:
38:05 1996
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)

We are currently using a 2 layer FR-4 board as a 2-up panel in our assembly 
factory and our board vendor has asked us if we are able to use x-outs. 
 Currently, we are not able to use x-outs given our equipment and line rate. 
 They say that this problem is causing 6%-8% fallout and want to increase 
our cost.  Consequently, our vendor has asked us if we can accept boards 
that have two good boards glued together into a panel.  They claim that 
there will be little difference between the panels and want to move forward 
with a trial run.

Does anyone else produce / use glued boards?
Is this fallout unusually high?
What are some problems we should look out for?

Any information is greatly appreciated!

Karl Kaylor
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2