Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
18 NOV 96 07:06:02 EST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"KEx9q.0.1-M.u45ao"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Mon Nov 18 10: |
52:50 1996 |
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vPSSv-0000RMC; Mon, 18 Nov 96 06:06 CST |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Many concerns come to mind with this lead length criteria. I assume that
you are talking about components that will be hand inserted into a plated
thru hole. The accepted norm in the past for all my applications has been
a max of 0.100"
Longer lead lengths mean that:
--Spacing between the leads will have to be increased because there will be
a greater tendency for the leads to short together during the wave solder
process.
--Your solder pot clearance will have to be adjusted for the lead length,
and as a result will have to throw a higher wave to contact the PCB,
possibly resulting in wave solder defects(skips) if not maintained
properly. If you are not using a nitrogen system, this will result in an
increased amount of dross.
--There is a greater tendency for the leads to be bent in normal handling
and could short to each other if they get bent.
--Consider the product design and how it fits in the package.
I recommend that you set a criteria of 0.060" +/- 0.030" for lead length.
This is an accepted standard and has been successful for years.
E. Holton
[log in to unmask]
-------------
Original Text
From: C=US/A=INTERNET/DDA=ID/TechNet-request(a)ipc.ipc.org, on 11/15/96
5:59 PM:
Greetings Technetters-
In the interest of streamlining a process, we're experimenting
with straight-thru assembly of leaded components in mixed-tech products.
The proposal on the table is to allow protrusion of up to 3.6mm (0.15").
This doesn't conform to existing IPC requirements (we're building Class 2
products).
What should be our concerns, other than potential shorts?
Why is Class 3 so stringent at 1.5mm max?
Thanks for your help.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
0
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|