TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vOcdF-0000R6C; Fri, 15 Nov 96 22:45 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Sat, 16 Nov 1996 00:00:54 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7755
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
From [log in to unmask] Mon Nov 18 10:
41:00 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"nRWoG2.0.DTO.eRKZo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Scott Miller <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer:
Mozilla 2.01 (Win95; U)
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Organization:
Far East Enterprises
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Does anyone know what is considered the industry norm for the allowable 
time one could store boards in an uncontrolled enviroment before 
concerns of oxidization or ionic contamination set in?  Is cleaning 
recommended prior to assembly on boards that have been stored for an 
extended period time?  Any and all feedback would be greatly 
appreciated.

Scott

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2