TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 15 NOV 96 15:50:34 MST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7748
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"5-kEg.0.XL6.r6FZo"@ipc>
From [log in to unmask] Fri Nov 15 17:
59:21 1996
From:
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vOWxT-0000VzC; Fri, 15 Nov 96 16:41 CST
Subject:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
The test method described by Dave Hillman is also described in EIA-638 "Surface 
Mount Solderability Test".

Tracy Tennant
Micron Technology
[log in to unmask]  
Folder: READ                                                  Message#   708378
From:   [log in to unmask]                     15-NOV-1996 14:54:01.22
To:     [log in to unmask]
CC:     [log in to unmask]
Subj:   Re: ASSY: BGA SOLDERABILITY

     Hi Jim -

     Have you ever noticed that specifications and technology just don't
     track together very well! The solderability of BGA components is a
     good instance of this fact. The ANSIJ-STD-002 doesn't specifically
     exclude the solderability testing of BGAs but the methods don't fit
     very well. One consideration is what solder sphere metallurgy do you
     have - 63/37 or 90/10 solder alloy? The 90/10 would allow you to do
     some solder dipping. My suggestion is to do a simulated surface mount
     test - this test will be in the next revision of the 002 spec but
     isn't in the current rev. The test amounts to stenciling a solder
     paste deposit that matches the component footprint on a nonsolderable
     substrate (PTFE, ceramic,etc), placing the component, running it
     through a reflow process, cleaning and inspecting for 95% wetting.
     This testing would satisfy both the solderability concerns and the
     001B question. As for your oxide question - it shouldn't be any
     different than other components if the  solder alloy is the same. Good
     Luck.



     Dave Hillman
     Rockwell Collins
     [log in to unmask]


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2