 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<simon.ipc.org!pbni.attmail.com!PBN!PBN1!JMcGee> |
| Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:11:00 +0000 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"xkPO12.0.3c7.74EZo"@ipc> |
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Nov 15 17: |
58:58 1996 |
| From: |
simon.ipc.org!pbni.attmail.com!PBN!PBN1!JMcGee (John McGee) |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vOVqc-0000WXC; Fri, 15 Nov 96 15:30 CST |
| Subject: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<MS-MAILG-2.00-Note-pbni-JMcGee-0848093728> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Greetings Technetters-
In the interest of streamlining a process, we're experimenting
with straight-thru assembly of leaded components in mixed-tech products.
The proposal on the table is to allow protrusion of up to 3.6mm (0.15").
This doesn't conform to existing IPC requirements (we're building Class 2
products).
What should be our concerns, other than potential shorts?
Why is Class 3 so stringent at 1.5mm max?
Thanks for your help.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
