TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X400-Content-Type:
P2-1988 ( 22 )
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
14 Nov 96 13:37:41 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Conversion:
Allowed
Disclose-Recipients:
Prohibited
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
Priority:
non-urgent
X-Loop:
Content-Return:
Allowed
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7706
TO:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> (Return requested)
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vO8Ga-0000ZNC; Thu, 14 Nov 96 14:20 CST
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Subject:
X400-Recipients:
non-disclosure;
X400-Originator:
Message-Id:
<00762328B66F5001*/c=us/admd=cwmail/prmd=carrier/o=syracuse/ou=ccmail1/s=Parr/g=Aric/@MHS>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Nftvn2.0.EiK.nxtYo"@ipc>
From [log in to unmask] Fri Nov 15 17:
45:43 1996
From:
"Aric Parr" <[log in to unmask]>
Alternate-Recipient:
Allowed
X400-Received:
by /c=us/admd=cwmail/; Relayed; 14 Nov 96 13:37:41 -0500 by mta MTAwltk in /c=us/admd=cwmail/; Relayed; 14 Nov 96 13:37:41 -0500
Content-Identifier:
00762328B66F5001
X400-Mts-Identifier:
[/c=us/admd=cwmail/; 00762328B66F5001-MTAwltk]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)

     We have multiple single sided panels with carbon ink keypads. To avoid 
     going double sided, or using multiple jumpers, we used the same carbon 
     ink as conductor traces over the solder mask. No reliability or yield 
     issues to date.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Silver Ink Screen Print.
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet
Date:    11/14/96 9:01 AM


Does anyone have any experiencies or information relating to "Silver Ink 
Screen Print" (or any other form of screen printed conductors).
     
We have a situation where we have a number of PCA designs which have only 
a few minor modifications required. These will be picked up at the next 
CAD revision, but in the mean time, we would like to investigate
screen printing additional connections accross the boards, without the 
need to hand wire.
     
Any comments are appreciated.
  ________________________________________________________________________
 | [log in to unmask]         David Tandy. EDA Specialist.   GenRad ADS. | 
 | Tel: (+44) 161 491 9191     Orion Business Park, Bird Hall Lane,       | 
 | Fax: (+44) 161 491 9292     Stockport, Cheshire, SK3 0XG, England.     | 
 |________________________________________________________________________|
     
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           * 
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        * 
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2