Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tnrgM-00005cC; Sat, 17 Feb 96 12:48 CST |
Encoding: |
1675 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 17 Feb 96 13:52:23 EST |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 19 09: |
20:18 1996 |
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"mdZvL3.0.OQA.zBY9n"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good point! I agree on the linewidth tolerance issues. How about
layer counts higher than 10 layers? They get real fun to drill when
all internals are comprised of HTE copper. 1/2 oz is far more easier
to drill with all that accumulated copper. As circuit density
increases and linewidth decreases, the 1/2 oz copper will be vital
to hold required critical linewidth tolerances. Like .004".004"
(Trace/Space) on dual stripline trying to hit 50 Ohms.
(That ones fun! Especially when the material(s) tolerance window
gives you basically +/- 6 ohms)
Groovy
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: FW: Half ounce internals
Author: [log in to unmask]
Date: 2/16/96 8:27 PM
One argument for using is 1/2 oz on internal layers is a reduction in line
width variation. There are very few PWB suppliers that can supply supply a
4 mil line +/-20% on 1oz copper. In addition, mixed copper thicknesses on a
layer pair [i.e. lyr 2 (top)and lyr 3 (bottom)] result in reduced yields. I
also don't believe there is anyone who can honestly quote a 3 mil line
+/-20% on 1oz copper and maintain the specification.
nwbluez
----------
From: TechNet-request
To: Technet
Subject: Half ounce internals
Date: Friday, February 16, 1996 4:40PM
A strong consideration for not using 1/2 ounce copper on internal
layers, is that you only half the width of copper to make a
connection at the barrel of plating. Possible problems. Be careful.
May not be reliable.
Norm Einarson
|
|
|