Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vO1zk-0000UsC; Thu, 14 Nov 96 07:38 CST |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
14 Nov 96 08:46:36 EST |
Precedence: |
list |
From [log in to unmask] Fri Nov 15 10: |
05:35 1996 |
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"EDtfG3.0.u_H.73oYo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are looking at puchasing a reflow oven for low volume periodic use. We need
more throughput than a batch oven, but nothing like a large contract house.
I don't have to be concerned with speed or throughput, but I do have to
be able to provide a repeatable consistent profile to impress my customers as
far as quality is concerned.
Two ovens I am looking at used presently are:
Knight-Line 416 26" preheat, 30" reflow full convection 1yr old
Vitronics 310 IR 3 top 3 bottom zones
The used equipment dealer says he can sell me the VItronics for the same price
-around $4k canadian as the Knight line. He insists it is a better value. I like
the full convection of the Knight line oven, and also that it is single phase
220, as oppose to 3 phase. I might also use the full convection properties of
the Knight for heat shrinking.
Any comments ?
Peter Roy
Broy Engineering Ltd
Toronto
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|