TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vLsjL-0000SHC; Fri, 8 Nov 96 09:20 CST
Disclose-recipients:
prohibited
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 08 Nov 1996 08:54:00 -0500 (EST)
MIME-version:
1.0
Precedence:
list
X400-MTS-identifier:
[;00820180116991/259318@ALLIN1]
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
Priority:
normal
X-Loop:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7534
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Nov 8 13:
19:11 1996
Alternate-recipient:
prohibited
Resent-Message-ID:
<"w2KyJ.0.gUH.v-qWo"@ipc>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
A1-type:
MAIL
TO:
MR-Received:
by mta ALLIN1; Relayed; Fri, 08 Nov 1996 10:28:00 -0500
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
Jim Marsico 516-595-5879 <[log in to unmask]>
Posting-date:
Fri, 08 Nov 1996 09:18:00 -0500 (EST)
Hop-count:
1
Importance:
normal
Message-id:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (43 lines)
Both J-STD-001B (paragraph 9.2.6.1, Figure 9-4, Note 1) and MIL-STD-2000A 
(paragraph 4.23.7.5) allow solder in the upper bend on gull wing leads.  
MIL-STD-2000A even goes further by saying "Solder in the stress relief bends 
does not constitute elimination of stress relief." (Table I, defect 3).  This 
changed from MIL-STD-2000 rev - which said "The solder fillet for any lead 
shall not extend into the start of the upper bend radius." (paragraph 
4.19.5.5).

I'm assuming that the requirement (or lack of) in the J-Standard was copied 
from the MIL Standard, rev A.  When MIL-STD-2000A was generated, was there test 
data which verified that the reliability integrity of gull wing devices wasn't 
compromised when solder entered the upper bend radius?

If anyone knows why the requirement changed, or, even better, knows where I can 
get the reliability data, this would be great.  I would also like to know if 
nobody knows why the requirement changed.

Thanks...

Jim Marsico
(516) 595-5879
[log in to unmask]
		
              ********************************
	      *	      ______   _   _  _____  *
	      *	     / ___  | | | | | _____  *
   	      *	    / /___| | | | | | _____  *
	      *	 __/  ____  | | | | |______  * 
	      * |____/    |_| |_| |________| *
	      *				     *
	      *	        SYSTEMS, INC.	     *
	      ********************************				       


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2