 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vLE6V-0000SBC; Wed, 6 Nov 96 13:57 CST |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<buetmi> |
| Date: |
Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:57:34 -0600 (CST) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Nov 7 13: |
17:09 1996 |
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9611061354.D67604-0100000@ipc> |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
RO |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"pcZhJ2.0.BpE.osEWo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear TechNet:
Regarding these postings, can we please honor Melinda's request and send
responses directly to her ([log in to unmask])? Thank you.
Mike Buetow
IPC
On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, keith larson wrote:
>
>
>
> >>
> >> Hello Melinda-
> >>
> >> Why does the IPC Board of Directors feel that job postings on the
> >> TechNet are not appropriate? I think that they are valuable to the
> >> TechNet community. They don't take very long to scan, can be passed on
> >> to others within a company, and if a set of rules were put together
> >> could be a simple "regulated" posting. Maybe I'm the odd person out
> >> but I don't really want another bulletin board to have to scan daily.
> >>
> >>
> >> Dave Hillman
> >> Rockwell Collins
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >>
> >
> >I agree.
>
> Ditto.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
