Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; Name="Message Body" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
6 Nov 1996 09:26:58 -0400 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Status: |
O |
From [log in to unmask] Wed Nov 6 08: |
58:08 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"6xHWt.0.xi3.0x9Wo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Mailing-List: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vL8qX-0000UFC; Wed, 6 Nov 96 08:20 CST |
X-Mailer: |
Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.1 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
RE>Capping vias for BGA's 11/6/96
Who recommends this?
We've never capped our BGA vias (either side) and haven't had any problems.
Regards,
Greg Bartlett
Mercury Computer Systems
Chelmsford, MA
[log in to unmask]
--------------------------------------
Date: 11/6/96 9:21 AM
To: Greg Bartlett
From: Charles Elliott
Hello,
My questions has to do with the capping of vias for BGA's.
Why is it recommended that vias be covered on the component side of
BGA boards ?
What are the implications of not following this recommendation ?
Thanks in advance for your input.
Charles Elliott
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by mailgate.mc.com with SMTP;6 Nov 1996 09:21:14 -0400
Received: from firewall.mc.com (firewall [192.148.197.15]) by jericho (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id JAA06439 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 09:21:09 -0500
Received: by firewall.mc.com id AA25350
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <[log in to unmask]>); Wed, 6 Nov 1996 09:21:08 -0500
Received: from ipc.org(168.113.24.64) by firewall via smap (V1.3)
id sma025348; Wed Nov 6 09:20:49 1996
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
id IAA06721; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:04:22 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:04:22 -0800
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vL7vX-0000QoC; Wed, 6 Nov 96 07:21 CST
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 96 08:27:51 EST
From: [log in to unmask] (Charles Elliott)
Message-Id: <9611061327.AA05472@kansys04>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Capping vias for BGA's
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Resent-Message-Id: <"sYt4_2.0.TMK.o39Wo"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7447
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|