TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vKqML-0000TUC; Tue, 5 Nov 96 12:36 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 05 Nov 1996 12:00:48 -0600
From [log in to unmask] Tue Nov 5 16:
51:24 1996
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7417
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"jH0cE.0.hF9.eauVo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
RICK VERNON <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
Novell GroupWise 4.1
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
What are typical values expected during a peel test of gull wing leads of
36 to 38 mil width? We are experiencing great variation in peel strength,
on the order of approximately 4 lbs to 12 lbs for the same lead location on
different boards (D-pak style package). Profiles have been checked and
are "typical", solder paste from Alpha is fresh. I am looking for info on
what could be causing this joint strength variability in our process.

Thanks in advance.
Rick Vernon, Quality Engineer
[log in to unmask]
Pheonix International Corp.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2