 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
4 NOV 96 14:46:19 EST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| X-Complete-Subject: |
IPC requirements for clinched leads |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vKWHt-0000S6C; Mon, 4 Nov 96 15:10 CST |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"h7FcR1.0.4H6.4lbVo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Nov 4 15: |
33:35 1996 |
| X-Mailer: |
2.3.5 ZOOMIT X.400/SMTP Dual Stack |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello, technetts:
I am looking for IPC requirements for clinched leads components.
According to IPC-A-610 Rev.A the clinched leads angle should be not less
than 45 degree and the minimum length was 0.030" for Class 2. The
next revision of IPC-A- 610B eliminated any variable requirements for
clicnched leads. Now it requires only that clinched leads will not reduce
minimum electrical clearance. In our case, we have a batch of boards with
DIP component leads that are flush to the board but not shorting to any
other traces. Is this acceptable ? Would we have any solderability
problems during wave soldering (solder under the clinched lead)?
Please, advise.
Thanks in advance
Stella Neyman
Lectron Products
810-608-7289
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
