TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tnGgR-0000E6C; Thu, 15 Feb 96 21:18 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 14 Feb 96 07:26:19 dst
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2707
From [log in to unmask] Fri Feb 16 08:
56:29 1996
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"o2H7z.0.rb8.YT_8n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
TO:
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
     We currently process core boards with vias in the surface mount pads. 
     Parts are soldered directly over the filled vias with plating and 
     solder over the vias. 
     
     Roxanne Tovey


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: via holes & surface mount components
Author:  [log in to unmask] at esdigate
Date:    2/13/96 10:39 AM


     Via hole should be atleast .025 away from surface mount pads.
     
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: via holes & surface mount components
Author:  [log in to unmask] at corp
Date:    2/12/96 4:10 PM
     
     
What is the minimum distance via holes can be to surface mount components?
     
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2