 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vJ6PI-0000VzC; Thu, 31 Oct 96 17:20 CST |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:44:07 -0600 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Nov 4 09: |
44:57 1996 |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Content-Description: |
cc:Mail note part |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"d_VOf2.0.JXJ.lGJUo"@ipc> |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Address,
Years back I bought and thoroughly read a Round Robin Study on
Accelerated Aging for Solderability Evaluations (IPC-TR-464), but
it was published back in 1984. Although technologies have changed,
the medium in which they are connected has not made such strides.
My questions are:
Has IPC-TR-464 been superceded or re-written?
Has much changed from the rewrite and the 1984 version?
Aside from a few industry changes in how specs are called out, can I
still count on the intent and main contents of the evaluation?
In addition to these questions, how can I obtain a list of current
Round Robin studies, the availability and cost.
Please advise. Thank you.
John Gulley
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
