TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 29 Oct 1996 19:56:57 -0500 (EST)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 31 16:
43:48 1996
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7210
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"IO0PH1.0.CyN.9FhTo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (D. Rooke)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vIPl4-0000QMC; Tue, 29 Oct 96 19:47 CST
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Vic, I did see your posting of this question and I'm very anxious to hear
responses. The reason is that I had previously asked (with limited response)
HOW one accurately measures 2-4 microinches of Gold. From the tone of your
E-mail it seems that this thickness of gold may be problematic.

Dave Rooke
Circo Craft - Pointe Claire

______ reply separator ______
>I sent this message earlier. At the same time, lost contact with Tech  Net.
>I'm not sure if this message got through. If it did, I apologize for the
>duplication.
>
>We purchase some pc boards with immersion gold over nickel to obtain
>flat pads for better stenciling of solder paste. Our spec is 5-8
>microinches of immersion gold over 150-200 microinches of electroless
>nickel. We have generally been successful. The indications are that
>about one year ago when this was first implemented, the gold plating
>was coming in per the spec.
>
>At this point, however, we are seeing the gold thickness to be more in
>the range of 2-4 microinches. We are still doing OK except for one batch
>of boards that came in recently. There are solderability problems with
>these boards. This batch is also associated with a solder mask change.
>But we also have other immersion gold boards with the same solder
>mask change and no solderability problems.
>
>Could it be that 2-4 microinches is at the ragged edge where the gold is
>insufficiently robust to withstand further processing at the fabricator and
>in assembly?
>
>Does anyone else have similar experiences with immersion gold in the
>2-4 microinch range?
>
>Is anyone consistently doing well with about 2-4 microinches of gold?
>
>Thanking you in advance.
>
>Vic Beldavs
>414-362-2797
>[log in to unmask]
>
>***************************************************************************
>* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
>***************************************************************************
>* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
>* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
>***************************************************************************
>
>
>

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2