TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tnEf0-0002JWC; Thu, 15 Feb 96 19:08 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 15 Feb 96 10:03:57 CST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2693
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"hQPXn2.0.3j8.Daz8n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"JBAUMGAR" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Thu Feb 15 19:
21:02 1996
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
     Does anyone "out there" have reliability data on using 0.5 ounce 
     internal layers?  I would like more data than just "It passed 2 solder 
     floats".  
     
     Thanks,
     Jamie Baumgart
     DSC Communications
     [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2