Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vIIoR-0000QPC; Tue, 29 Oct 96 12:22 CST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 1996 12:08:20 -0600 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 31 16: |
38:42 1996 |
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
Content-Description: |
cc:Mail note part |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"vYwfy1.0.0ZN.zjaTo"@ipc> |
Resent-Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Address,
Unless I'm missing it, IPC-SM-782 does not define how much spacing is
under the package (lead contact to package bottom). I need to add a
0603 or 0805 chip resistor underneath a PLCC-44 for a minor revision
change.
Question:
Is it possible to add a 0603/0805 with a .016/.024 package height,
respectively under a PLCC-44?
Has anyone done this and acheived a reasonable solder paste flow under
the package or did the PLCC-44 rob the passive devices of heat?
I think the PLCC-44 may crush (crack) the underlying devices in
assembly unless there is enough height?
Please advise.
John Gulley
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|