TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vHwLz-0000RUC; Mon, 28 Oct 96 12:24 CST
Sender:
[log in to unmask] (Jan Satterfield)
Old-Return-Path:
date:
Mon, 28 Oct 96 10:56
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7183
Content-description:
Message Body
TO:
CINDY KEMP ORLANDO ISC *8-306-6873 <[log in to unmask]>, "mail@ih [log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, dabonz <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"kcGok.0.rkN.1fFTo"@ipc>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From [log in to unmask] Mon Oct 28 12:
45:40 1996
From:
[log in to unmask] (Jan Satterfield)
Date:
Wednesday, October 23, 1996 7:12AM
cc:
Subject:
message-id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)

We also use a UR conformal coating.  In the "olden days" we did have an 
occasional plastic components which the coating would not adhere to.  At 
that time we masked off those components and did not conformal coat them.
 ----------
From: CINDY KEMP ORLANDO ISC *8-306-6873
To: dabonz; jasatt; 'mail@ih <[log in to unmask]>'
Cc: 'mail@ih <[log in to unmask]>'
Subject: FWD: pwb-cca : conformal coating

Technet,

I'm forwarding this from a colleague.

Cindy Kemp
Lockheed Martin
Orlando, FL
****************************************************************************  
***
*

From: [log in to unmask]
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 96 16:35:22 EDT
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: pwb-cca : conformal coating
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: bulk

hi group;

We are finding that in designs using conformal coating (UR) over plastic 
parts
that the cc is dewetting on the parts.

Question - is this seen as a problem ?

I am proposing that a note should be added to our designs as follows:

     CONFORMAL COAT DEWETTING ON PLASTIC ENCAPSULATED MICROCIRCUIT
     COMPONENT BODY IS ACCEPTABLE.

If there is a better way please let me here from you.

What is the real would doing ?


               thanx; Skip Greb
========================================================================
To learn more about this email exploder (majordomo), including how to
unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to: [log in to unmask]
and place the command "help" in the body of the message - subject may be
left blank. Help can also be obtained on the WWW at
http://www.epic.lmco.com/Majordomo
========================================================================

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2