 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vDz0M-0000QoC; Thu, 17 Oct 96 15:25 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
multipart/mixed; boundary="------------47AF1CD2BE3" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 17 Oct 1996 14:30:39 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 17 16: |
10:27 1996 |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"hBHmV3.0.4XO.nOfPo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Mailer: |
Mozilla 3.0b6 (Win95; I) |
| Organization: |
NEXTEK |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The best test is to have the substrate supplier perform actual sample
wirebonding by lot in their facility to your process specifications and
provide pull and/or shear test results to you with each lot of
substrates. Many of the better suppliers already have this capability.
Phil Yates
Nextek, Inc.
*************************************************
Jim Douglas wrote:
>
> Advice please !
> Is there a quantitative test that can be carried out on soft gold electroplate to qualify its suitability for wire bonding ?
> Gold thickness and purity already to customers spec.
> Note in this instance gold is on a nickel undercoat.
>
> Jim Douglas
> Kam Circuits
>
> ***************************************************************************
> * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
> ***************************************************************************
> * To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
> * [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
> ***************************************************************************
|
|
|
