TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tmRUz-00005HC; Tue, 13 Feb 96 14:38 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:33:37 -0600
MIME-version:
1.0
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2665
TO:
Return-Path:
X-Loop:
Message-id:
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 13 14:
40:40 1996
From:
BOB HOENE <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"4xMjf2.0.HiD.RRF8n"@ipc>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
X-Mailer:
Novell GroupWise 4.1
Subject:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
We are considering the efficacy of implementing x-ray process analysis
in line with our smt assembly line. The system we are considering is
manufactured by Four Pi systems and would be either their 3DX or 5DX
instrument. Before we get too far down the path, we would like to hear
any commentary from users of this system or similar systems as to their
real worth. Their sales data paints a pretty rosy picture and purports
substantial improvements in throughput and reduced costs allocated for 
inspection, rework, warranty dollars, and lost margin. No doubt it may
even make mounds and mounds of julienne fries. Worth our time to
continue looking at this? No competitive sales pitches please.

Bob Hoene
Marquette Electronics, Inc.
Milwaukee, WI



ATOM RSS1 RSS2