TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tmOnI-00006yC; Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:45 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 13 Feb 96 09:33:42 PST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2661
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"4ttRj2.0.5e5._uC8n"@ipc>
From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 13 14:
38:45 1996
From:
"asingh" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
     Via hole should be atleast .025 away from surface mount pads.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: via holes & surface mount components
Author:  [log in to unmask] at corp
Date:    2/12/96 4:10 PM


What is the minimum distance via holes can be to surface mount components?
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2