Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 1996 10:17:30 -0500 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Oct 15 11: |
57:34 1996 |
X-Sender: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ACg933.0.YPG.EaxOo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vDCBE-0000XzC; Tue, 15 Oct 96 11:17 CDT |
Message-Id: |
<v01540b06ae895aa0f7df@[204.180.62.40]> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have a client that is building a new facility and wants to put in ESD
safe flooring. They have done a lot of review, and based on literature and
salesment, have narrowed choices to an epoxy base or a carbon filled
urethane base poured floor. There is significant cost difference between
the two, and one has a longer projected life.
Does anyone have any experience with either of these flooring materials (or
other choices) that they would be willing to share either on the net or
one-on-one regarding this subject? Thanks
***ALL NEW EMPF PHONE NUMBERS***
Jack Crawford
HelpLine Manager
Electronics Mfg. Productivity Facility
****NEW--317.655.3688--NEW****
*****FAX 317-655-3699 NEW ****
714 N Senate Ave, Suite 100
Indianapolis IN 46202-3112
VISIT OUR HOME PAGE AT:
http://www.empf.org
You got this msg so look at the top for my e-mail address.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|