TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 8 Jan 1996 15:13:26 -0600
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jan 8 16:
58:35 1996
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
RO
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2183
X-Sender:
[log in to unmask] (Unverified)
TO:
Return-Path:
Precedence:
list
Resent-Message-ID:
<"XxHjY.0.iaF.dXOym"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Jon Jahn)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tZOqO-0000O0C; Mon, 8 Jan 96 15:11 CST
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
About a year I read an article which referenced a NASA study in discussing
maximum allowable solder joint rework cycles. Can anyone point me toward
that information again or alternatively suggest any other references which
will help us update this rework guideline?

regards,

Jon Jahn
Marquip, Inc.
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2