 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
11 Oct 96 13:20:56 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Oct 15 08: |
39:15 1996 |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"azaqP2.0.YTM.-FbOo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vCoPi-0000ZuC; Mon, 14 Oct 96 09:54 CDT |
| Sender: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
<UGate 2.10> |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have run into a problem with a board that has vias in smt pads. We
need all of the vias plugged, and I am told that solder mask is the best
way to do that. This is to ensure that a good vacuum is maintained for
our ATE equipment. That is the problem. I can not have a via covered
with solder mask on top of an smt pad. The board house I am using says
this is difficult for them because they have to determine which vias are
plugged and which are not. Anyone out there with any suggestions?
Thanks,
Barry Darnell
(864)627-8800 Ext. 231
[log in to unmask]
CD Electronics, Inc.
Printed Circuit Board Designer
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
