 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vCoNn-0000RbC; Mon, 14 Oct 96 09:52 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 14 Oct 1996 09:11:33 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Oct 15 08: |
38:45 1996 |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Content-Description: |
cc:Mail note part |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"uMU6G2.0.ZSA.qEbOo"@ipc> |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Address,
From past design reviews we have always used 2 fiducials per 15mil and
20mil SMT devices (my opinion, standard). Recently our designers are
placing 1 fiducial in the center of the device location. I'm not an
agreement with this change due to possible lead skew on pads and
similar problems. Has visual P&P equipment changed such, that 2
fiducials are no longer required or none at all. Please advise.
John Gulley
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
