Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tmLWi-0000AVC; Tue, 13 Feb 96 08:16 CST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:26:48 +0100 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
X-Sender: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Bw2H83.0.yBF.lq98n"@ipc> |
From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 13 14: |
35:27 1996 |
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Subject: |
|
Message-Id: |
<v01520d03ad4625950dd1@[129.132.54.198]> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
William
Thank you very much for your comments.
First I am really sorry about the the mess with my E- mails to TechNet. I
got a whole bunch of messages from our local server as well as from some
"SMTPLINK-anything" that my messages are undeliverable and now it seems
that some came trough without my address. Maybe there will be some more
soon.
Concerning your questions:
Instrument: Protonique Contaminometer CEM5.
Test solution: 1/1 Water/Isopropanol.
Test time: Max. 15 Min. or less than 1 percent change of the last 12
measurements average.
Temperature: 22-25°C
I find your comments very interesting. I think I should go after the fact
you mentioned that water soluble fluxes cleaned with water just seem
cleaner than others in ICT. However, I had the impression that my results
correlate well with the measurement of the thickness of the residues with
the help of microsections. Anyway I fell it would be exiting to do more
work in this field.
Guenter Grossmann
|
|
|