 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vBj3Y-0000QzC; Fri, 11 Oct 96 09:59 CDT |
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Oct 11 13: |
21:25 1996 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 11 Oct 1996 10:24:02 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"sUvdV3.0.1IN.63cNo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John,
What you have proposed is the best test.
No matter what "analytical" test is run the
final question comes down to is "Will it solder
in your process".
In the 462 round robin we found boards with
tons (.0.001") of solder on them that soldered
poorly and others with much less solder that
performed beautifully.
Susan Mansilla
Robisan Laboratory
317-353-6249
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
