 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vBPCX-0000TlC; Thu, 10 Oct 96 12:47 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 10 Oct 96 12:26:51 EDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"CWoHb.0.b5L.aQJNo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 10 15: |
10:01 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi;
We are looking to make our raw printed circuit cards more "friendly"
for labeling/barcoding/etc. at the assembled pc card level, particularly
for our OEM customer base.
I'd like to gather some data on what other assembly houses "like" and
"use" for labeling schemes. Do you prefer adhesive labels or
some marking direct on the pc card? does it help to have white ID
encircle the label location?
Any information, general or specific would be helpful.
thanks!
Jim Herard
Product Quality Engineering
IBM Microelectronics, Endicott Printed Circuit Fabrication
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
