 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vBL3i-0000PoC; Thu, 10 Oct 96 08:21 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=Iso-8859-1; name=body.txt |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 10 Oct 1996 08:04:00 -0600 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| >Received: |
by relay.thebureau.com (UUPC/extended 1.12p);
Thu, 10 Oct 1996 08:21:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 10 14: |
46:46 1996 |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"KcRGH1.0.0t7.nXFNo"@ipc> |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| X-Mailer: |
MimeLink version 1.50B |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have a customer who is seeking information on the qualification of SIMM
style printed wiring boards. Does anyone have suggestions on what type of
qualification/reliability testing would be appropriate for this type of
qualification. We have surveyed some of our other customers but have not
received much feed-back.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
