 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vAd4w-0000QPC; Tue, 8 Oct 96 09:24 CDT |
| References: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 08 Oct 1996 10:17:51 EDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Oct 8 09: |
58:14 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"HrxLJ.0.qQ4.-FcMo"@ipc> |
| X-Juno-Line-Breaks: |
0,5-10 |
| From: |
|
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Juno 1.15 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Scott,
You might try Edmund Scientific Company for a UV filter at the wave
length in question. If you want to build up a home made test box, you
could put the filter over you current light meter and read the intensity
that way. All or your readings would be relative but it may be a quick
way of checking things out.
Scott Decker
Electronics Designer
AKA: PadMasterson
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
