Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tm4Xq-00013BC; Mon, 12 Feb 96 14:08 CST |
Encoding: |
24 TEXT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 13 11: |
40:23 1996 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
Jim Marsico <"marsico%Organization=Industrial & Mfg'g Engineering%Telephone=516-595-5879"@a1.allin1.ALLIN1.umc> |
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"UNiRi2.0.z73.nuv7n"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 96 15:10:00 EST |
X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
Cc: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim,
If you have access to the book "Surface Mount Technology: Recent Japanese
Developments,"
published by IEEE Press, 1993, there is an interesting discussion of
tombstoning in the Chapter
which begins on p 77 "Overview of Placement and Bonding Technology for 1005
Components
and 0.3mm-Pitch LSIs: An Equipment Perspective."
-------
>From: Jim Marsico
>To: technet
>Subject: TOMBSTONING
>Date: Thursday, February 08, 1996 7:20PM
>
>What are some of the major causes of tombstoning of small chip SMT
components?
>
>Jim M.
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
|
|
|